<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Remote Viewing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/main-menu/introduction-to-remote-viewing/134-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com</link>
	<description>The Science and Theory of Nonphysical Perception</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyani The Peacock Fairy</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/comment-page-1/#comment-11176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyani The Peacock Fairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/?page_id=134#comment-11176</guid>
		<description>Written 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyani The Peacock Fairy</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/comment-page-1/#comment-11175</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyani The Peacock Fairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/?page_id=134#comment-11175</guid>
		<description>AN ESOTERIC THEORY ON TIME

If it takes light from Alpha Centaurus 4.5 years to reach Earth then does it take Earth&#039;s light the same time to reach AC? I guess not, as the position of the sun is different for a viewing reflective perspective and also the energy of both masses would be different. So what they radiate would be different.

Now, they both sit in the same time – or do they? But from my perspective they both exist now. But at the same time they exist in different times, as one is deemed (probably) older than the other. Who really knows?  A lot is based on theory and known physics.  What about unknown physics?

*Take two human beings in a room for example, separated by space and time.  They occupy different space in the same broader space (room) and are functioning during the same present time, which immediately becomes the past, while still having a future, which is different for both entities supposedly living in the same time.

a.	There must only be a present given the above. –0+ (ppf or past/present/future) = trinity = negative/positive=neutral.
b.	One entity’s energy light must take a certain amount of time to reach the other entity’s sensor field, and vice versa.  Does this energy source travel at the same speed for each?  I would say no, as each energy source would be different, as different entities and the sensory abilities of each entity to pick up/translate/assimilate would be different for each.
c.	They would not be the same age.  One would have manifested before the other in its life span. (I am talking about this physical region of humans).
d.	Because one is older than the other, (assuming this is so, even if they are the same age, they would have come in at a different space) then all of its past is its present, and that which has not come into being, is also its present.

Logically, if there is infinite space and time and it is the energy that puts it all into motion, then is it that without energy there is only eternal emptiness?

No motion without energy
No time without motion
No space without time.

They all need one another to exist; to manifest or is energy the supreme manifestation? Because it activates all states of being.  Is energy the logos? Where did it originate from?  What is the vital force? Does it stand alone without time and space? Does it need time and space or do time and space need it?

Is this the same argument as the sum having knowledge of the parts that make it up or can the sum or total stand-alone.  Zero needs nothing to be recognised or does it become zero or emptiness only because it is not negative –1 to n- or positive +1n+?? Does it matter?  What is matter? All the above or none of the above????

Gyani The Peacock Angel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AN ESOTERIC THEORY ON TIME</p>
<p>If it takes light from Alpha Centaurus 4.5 years to reach Earth then does it take Earth&#8217;s light the same time to reach AC? I guess not, as the position of the sun is different for a viewing reflective perspective and also the energy of both masses would be different. So what they radiate would be different.</p>
<p>Now, they both sit in the same time – or do they? But from my perspective they both exist now. But at the same time they exist in different times, as one is deemed (probably) older than the other. Who really knows?  A lot is based on theory and known physics.  What about unknown physics?</p>
<p>*Take two human beings in a room for example, separated by space and time.  They occupy different space in the same broader space (room) and are functioning during the same present time, which immediately becomes the past, while still having a future, which is different for both entities supposedly living in the same time.</p>
<p>a.	There must only be a present given the above. –0+ (ppf or past/present/future) = trinity = negative/positive=neutral.<br />
b.	One entity’s energy light must take a certain amount of time to reach the other entity’s sensor field, and vice versa.  Does this energy source travel at the same speed for each?  I would say no, as each energy source would be different, as different entities and the sensory abilities of each entity to pick up/translate/assimilate would be different for each.<br />
c.	They would not be the same age.  One would have manifested before the other in its life span. (I am talking about this physical region of humans).<br />
d.	Because one is older than the other, (assuming this is so, even if they are the same age, they would have come in at a different space) then all of its past is its present, and that which has not come into being, is also its present.</p>
<p>Logically, if there is infinite space and time and it is the energy that puts it all into motion, then is it that without energy there is only eternal emptiness?</p>
<p>No motion without energy<br />
No time without motion<br />
No space without time.</p>
<p>They all need one another to exist; to manifest or is energy the supreme manifestation? Because it activates all states of being.  Is energy the logos? Where did it originate from?  What is the vital force? Does it stand alone without time and space? Does it need time and space or do time and space need it?</p>
<p>Is this the same argument as the sum having knowledge of the parts that make it up or can the sum or total stand-alone.  Zero needs nothing to be recognised or does it become zero or emptiness only because it is not negative –1 to n- or positive +1n+?? Does it matter?  What is matter? All the above or none of the above????</p>
<p>Gyani The Peacock Angel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen Eulich</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/comment-page-1/#comment-6732</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen Eulich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/?page_id=134#comment-6732</guid>
		<description>I sawr a car that I touched without evr seeing it but my symboluc sychic feeling took the micrascop and took the flying sucer frm ur mind,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sawr a car that I touched without evr seeing it but my symboluc sychic feeling took the micrascop and took the flying sucer frm ur mind,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubert</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/?page_id=134#comment-603</guid>
		<description>They have explained it very well on here ---&gt; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_(parapsychology)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have explained it very well on here &#8212;&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_(parapsychology)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_(parapsychology)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briannamadison69</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Briannamadison69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scientificremoteviewing.com/?page_id=134#comment-577</guid>
		<description>what does psi mean ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does psi mean ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

